Costa Rica / Photo: Wha’ppen
Happiness and long life expectancy don’t have to cost the earth.
In a recent article at Brave New Traveler, I discussed 5 Key Ingredients in the Search for Happiness. What I didn’t take into account was the planet we live on. Can we be satisfied, live a long life, and be good to the earth?
The Happy Planet Index (HPI) doesn’t solely indicate people’s happiness levels. It measures happiness levels in relation to a country’s consumption of its natural resources. Its aim is to prove that you can be happy without raping the planet. From the HPI website:
The nations that top the Index aren’t the happiest places in the world, but the nations that score well show that achieving long, happy lives without over-stretching the planet’s resources is possible.
What is the HPI?
2009 is the second year that the Index was put together. It was started by the new economics foundation (nef) — an independent think-and-do tank — whose tagline is “economics as if people and the planet mattered” and who explains their goal as such:
We aim to improve quality of life by promoting innovative solutions that challenge mainstream thinking on economic, environmental and social issues. We work in partnership and put people and the planet first.
Photo: Uncle Kick-Kick
Obviously, the HPI takes into account several factors and by its nature is subject to debate, given that quality of life is a subjective factor. In the end, the HPI measures well-being delivered per unit of environmental impact.
A country achieving a maximum life satisfaction score of 10, and life expectancy of 85, whilst living within its global fair share of resources (one-planet living), would score 100.
For detailed information about how the HPI is calculated, you can view the full report here.
The results
So just what country is the happiest while doing its fair share in ensuring a happy planet? Costa Rica.
Costa Rica scored a 76.1 on the HPI for its high levels of life satisfaction, long life expectancy and low ecological footprint (one-quarter that of the United States). Second and third go to the Dominican Republic and Jamaica, respectively. In fact, nine out of the top ten nations in the HPI are Latin American.
At the other end of the spectrum, rich and developed nations fared poorly. Out of 143 countries, the highest ranking Western nation is the Netherlands at 43rd. The UK sits at 74th. And where exactly is the USA in this Index? 114th. While the Dutch only live on average one year longer than Americans and have similar life satisfaction, their ecological footprint is half that of the US, accounting for the significant difference in ranking.
Photo: Joe Shablotnik
What does it all mean?
I think that many of us living in rich, developed countries already had an inkling that we might not fare well in something like this. While life expectancy may be improving (Canada is ranked number one there) due to medical advances, life satisfaction is on the decline as we sacrifice things that are important to us — family, friends, time — in the chase for money and career progression.
Add to that the enormous amounts of resources we use, much of which is non-renewable, and the low rankings are inevitable.
It’s becoming more and more evident that our current economic models which rely on infinite growth and which don’t factor in the environment aren’t working. If we become rich at the expense of the planet, what good is that? The HPI is a refreshing and practical measurement which balances our health, quality of life, and our effects on the earth. This is the new economics.
COMMUNITY CONNECTION
Journalist Eric Weiner circled the globe in search of the world’s happiest countries. Read a review of his book, The Geography of Bliss, here.
About the Author
More By This Author
- The World's Air Traffic Over 24 Hours (in 1 minute 12) (8 comments)
- Reminder to Australians: National Ride to Work Day is Coming Up! (2 comments)
- How To Be Good (Better) Drivers and Cyclists (12 comments)
Related Posts
9 Comments... join the discussion!
-
-
Cool, I went and checked your Links and got lost for an hour !
↵ -
I know exactly how you feel. Lots of interesting info in those and it always leads to more!
↵ -
Then, with this Stumble thingy I got and Tweets and not nuf coffee, typin’ keys stickin’; it’s a jungle in here !
↵ -
Jamaica and the DR, for serious? I thought they were supposed to be two of the worst examples of the typical Caribbean tourism-based economy – high-priced resorts and big spenders inside the walls, severe poverty (and at least in Jamaica’s case, substantial violence, often drug-related) outside. Never figured that’d be a recipe for happiness, or long life expectancy. Wow.
↵ -
Here are excerpts from the report (link above in article) on DR and Jamaica:
DR:
Whilst the Dominican Republic’s condition is similar to many other countries in the region – a medium score in the Human Development Index, dependence on the USA for trade, relatively high life expectancy given its income levels and, high levels of inequality – unlike many of its neighbours it manages to achieve a life expectancy of over 70 years with a very small footprint.Jamaica:
Jamaica’s appearance in the top three of the HPI table comes somewhat as a surprise. It is fair to say that the country has been in some economic trouble for over 30 years, resulting in high levels of inequality and unemployment, and some of the highest homicide rates in the world. Moderate levels of life satisfaction perhaps reflect this reality.
And yet, despite these problems, the island is able to maintain some of the best levels of health in the developing world, as indicated by its high average life expectancy. Together with its very small ecological footprint, it is this which puts Jamaica towards the top of the HPI table.↵ -
“An independent think-and-do tank — whose tagline is ‘economics as if people and the planet mattered’”… I LOVE this. Inspiring stuff!
↵ -
This is interesting, it’s part of the conclusion in the report (if you don’t feel like opening the PDF):
“Latin America. Let’s not beat about the bush. The region has had, and continues to have, its fair share of misery: decades of civil wars and coups, the destruction of the Amazon, sharp inequality, and the favelas and slums of metropolises from Mexico City to Sao Paulo. For some, the region represents a sad tale of lost opportunity. In 1900, Chile, Argentina and Mexico all had higher per capita GDPs than Japan. Even Colombia’s GDP per capita was only half that of Italy’s or Norway’s (nowadays it is behind by factors of four and six respectively). But, while Italy, Norway and Japan have all strengthened into rich and relatively equal societies, Latin American countries have, for the most part, fallen down the list of the richest countries.
And yet, the top two sub-regions in terms of the HPI are those of Latin America. What sense can we make of this success? Are Latin Americans as happy as they say they are? And what, if anything, can the rest of the world learn from Latin America?
Survey data reveals two key features of Latin American culture. One is the presence of relatively unmaterialistic aspirations and values, compared to countries with similar economic conditions. Latin Americans report being much less concerned with material issues than, for example, they are with their friends and family. Secondly, social capital is particularly strong in the region. Civil society is very active, from religious groups to workers’ groups to environmental groups. The data on ‘formal’ social capital is reflected in anecdotal evidence of informal social capital in terms of strong family and community ties.
We have already seen, in Chapter 3, how these two factors – non-material aspirations and social relations – are crucial to well-being. In Latin America, they combine to create a society that is able to rise above economic hardships, whilst drawing great benefit from its social links. It is worth noting that, despite a poor economic record in terms of average income and an even poorer record in terms of inequality, Latin America still enjoys levels of health that are close to those of Central Europe and often superior to Eastern Europe. As well as reasonable state provision in many countries (e.g., in Colombia almost half of the country’s 44 million people enjoy free public health care), this is likely to be in part due to strong social networks forming a safety net for those who are less fortunate.
Some have mocked the high levels of reported life satisfaction in Latin American countries as belying a lack of knowledge of anything better (i.e. Western lifestyles). On the contrary, Latin America is perhaps more exposed to North American culture than anywhere else in the developing world. Yet somehow it has been more resistant to idolising this lifestyle, or at least more able to be happy with its own way of life despite this influence. Pura vida is a popular expression in Costa Rica which is used somewhat like the English term ‘cool’. It translates literally as ‘pure life’ and represents in itself an attitude to what is important.”
(the bolding is mine)
↵ -
It has had more than it’s “fair-share” of misery, like people celebrating independence when they don’t have it.
There is much to be appreciated in Latin American countries, but that stuff is one-sided propaganda lies.
I have read the climategate emails: change the data, cut government grants of people who disagree, and change the conclusions of the report in several places in the report.
The “scientists” in agreement with “global warming” receive corporate and government grants, and their “opinion” is paid for.
There is nothing “objective” about their “science”.
You got me interested in your website, because on the first page you said read John McPhee. After that, well, I don’t see a reason to read further.
Living a long time, in poverty, and having practically no opportunity for bright young kids to achieve is no example of any kind of “happiness” or what is good for the planet.
My college town had a Japanese family, that raised fresh eggs and fresh vegetables for the entire area on a small amount of land, using new “advanced” and “old” techniques.
They supplied the grocery stores, the restaurants and the hotel.
They were a successful small business and their family was prospering, including sending their children to the college of their choice.
They were ran out of business, by the same big grocery store exploiting Mexico now. That would be Safeway, using DDT and other chemicals in Mexico that are not allowed in USA because of the “green movement” here.
The problem is big business, big corporations, and big money (i.e. the financiers).
It is not a problem that has national borders, nor racial overtones.
↵
