What if you had a goal to deliver aid to millions of people politically and geographically isolated from the rest of the world? What if governments actively discouraged you and created numerous obstacles? Then, what if you just went ahead and did it anyway?
Photo: British MP George Galloway speaks to the media as he arrives in Gaza. ISM Palestine Feature photo: gloucester2gaza
That is George Galloway’s goal–to organize a 500 vehicle convoy with as many people to deliver $10 million dollars in aid and medical supplies for the people of Gaza through the Egyptian border.
Ambitious? Yes. Realistic? Absolutely.
George Galloway, controversial member of the UK Parliament and founder of the Viva Palestina campaign, is on a whirlwind tour of major U.S. cities to raise awareness about the situation in Gaza.
Viva Palestina: A Lifeline from the United States to Gaza, is the second round of a remarkable feat that Galloway and hundreds of concerned global citizens pulled off this spring.
Photo: ISM Palestine
Starting from Britain, volunteers drove a mile-long convoy of over 100 vehicles through Belgium, France, and Spain, ferried across the Strait of Gibraltar to Morocco, then drove westward across the North African desert. A month later, and over 9,000 miles traveled across nine countries, Viva Palestina arrived in Gaza with 12 ambulances, a fire engine, buses, a boat, and hundreds of trucks full of medicine, food, blankets, clothes, tools, and gifts for children.
This is the material from which epic movies are made.
George Galloway is a leftist MP, elected several times in the British Parliament. The outspoken Galloway is no stranger to taking positions contrary to prevailing political winds. He opposed the Iraq sanctions in the 1990s and campaigned to prevent the invasion of Iraq in 2003. He is optimistic and determined about his new campaign. “There’s a new atmosphere in the US over Palestine,” he says; “the phenomenal response to this tour demonstrates that.”
At a speaking event hosted by MECA (Middle Eastern Children’s Alliance) in Berkeley, California on May 20, Galloway told the audience about the stumbling blocks along the way, including the arrest of nine volunteers detained under British Anti-Terrorism laws even before the caravan got underway.
Photo: Viva Palestina convoy arrives in Gaza. ISM Palestine
Crossing the borders of North African nations was no simple task either. Galloway was struck by how little support there was–even among Arab governments–for the people in Gaza. Egypt– partly because the U.S. gives it billions of dollars in military aid every year– was not very enthusiastic about the trip. But it was through their border at Rafah that the convoy finally reached Gaza.
Libya was the one Arab country that genuinely supported the effort, giving the campaign free fuel and accommodations. The border between Libya and Algeria was opened for the first time in 15 years, allowing the caravan to go through. Galloway told the audience that Libyan leader Colonel Gaddafi asked him how many vehicles they had in the convoy.
Galloway answered, “110.”
Gaddafi responded, “Now you have 220.”
In contrast to their political leaders, the citizens of each country displayed solidarity. Galloway described how people went miles out of their way to bring the convoy supplies to carry to the people of Gaza.
Since Hamas (Islamic Resistance Movement) took control of Gaza in 2007, it has been subject to an international blockade, Israeli restrictions, and a ban on exports, causing a humanitarian crisis for the 1.5 million people who live on that isolated strip of land 25 miles long and six miles wide.
Despite a cease-fire in June 2008, Israel did little to reduce its military blockade. In the context of worsening conditions, the cease-fire began to seriously unravel on November 4, when Israel made an incursion into Gaza and killed six Palestinians, followed by an air strike, calling it a preemptive measure to remove a threat. Hamas fired rockets into Israeli territory. On December 27, 2008, Israel began aerial bombardment on Gaza in response, followed by a ground invasion.
Ambitious? Yes. Realistic? Absolutely.
It was the intensification of collective punishment for the people of Gaza. As Karen Koning AbuZayd of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees reported in January, “Gaza is on the threshold of becoming the first territory to be intentionally reduced to a state of abject destitution, with the knowledge, acquiescence and– some would say–encouragement of the international community.”
Organizations ranging from the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) and UNICEF to the International Committee of the Red Cross have expressed alarm over the ongoing humanitarian crisis in the blockaded Gaza Strip. Tony Blair said in March that Israel must lift the blockade immediately. “I don’t think anybody can come here and not be appalled by what is happening,” Blair declared.
George Galloway and hundreds of others certainly were appalled and are doing something about it. The U.S. convoy is set to depart on July 4, U.S. Independence Day. Co-leading the U.S. campaign is Ron Kovic, long-time peace activist, Vietnam War veteran, and star of the Oliver Stone film, “Born on the Fourth of July,” in which he was portrayed by Tom Cruise. After that, the next convoy is set to depart October 4, traveling via Europe and Asia (about 3,500 miles over 18 days).
The plan: volunteers will fly to Egypt, buy the vehicles and medical supplies in Cairo, and then head for the Egyptian border with Gaza. If things go as planned, the people of Gaza will receive much needed humanitarian aid and international solidarity from the people of the United States.
Talk about travel with a purpose.
For more background information on the situation, visit GazaSiege or ElectronicIntifada. For more information about the humanitarian convoy, visit Viva Palestina.
About the Author
More By This Author
- Mad as Hell Doctors Take Their Tour on the Road (4 comments)
- Citizen Diplomacy in Iran (5 comments)
- First Person Dispatch from the Chevron Protest (5 comments)
Related Posts
9 Comments... join the discussion!
-
-
Thanks – this is really inspiring. I hadn’t heard of the Lifeline to Gaza and am glad I did.
↵ -
I’m all for aid to the civilians in Gaza but Galloway is one nasty piece of work.
The fact that I generally agree with his causes (though not to the extreme he does – for instance, I opposed the invasion of Iraq but would never describe the hypothetical murder of Tony Blair as “morally justifiable,” as Galloway did) doesn’t make his rhetoric any less inflammatory or ugly. He represents the opposite of dialogue. He’s the Bill O’Reilly of the left.
↵ -
Eva,
Thanks for the comment. I agree with you, Galloway has spewed some really nasty things. It raises some interesting questions. What’s the best way to support a cause that have leaders and others who do admirable things but use ugly rhetoric? It is like going to a rally or demonstration and people do or say things that you see as harmful to the cause. I run into that issue often. Framing matters. The most recent discussion I had along those lines–though much more mild–was this weekend when I went to the Anti-Corp Film Festival. There was a moderate number of people there. The films there would be widely enjoyed and appreciated by many people (Sweet Crude and Blue Gold, about oil and water respectively), many of who wouldn’t ever respond to “Anti-corp” framing. My friend and I asked what would have happened if it would have been advertised in different terms? “Tear down capitalism!” vs. “there is a water scarcity problem and we should be concerned about a small number of people getting control over it for profit.” It’s always an interesting question to ask how to frame and communicate issues. A lot depends on the audience, but what if you want to read the widest audience?
My purpose was to raise awareness about the Gaza situation and the aid effort. Hopefully people who are turned off Galloway can still see through to the purpose of the campaign.
↵ -
Great points, Ryan. My aim here wasn’t to criticize your post, just pointing out my general distaste for Galloway. The cause is a good one — I do think, though, that the harm Galloway does goes beyond just excluding people who are turned off by his rhetoric. I do think nasty, violent rhetoric does tangible harm on its own terms, in its effect on the ways we all relate to each other as we try to hash these things out. (And hey, I guess this thread is an example of things going right!
)
↵ -
Galloway is very outspoken and he definitely leaves politically correct speeches to his colleagues MPs, but he’s one of the few (very few) who still care about people’s rights.
↵ -
Palestine really does get a bum rap on the international stage. I’m glad to see people fighting for the Palestinians.
↵ -
Ryan-
Great discussion– my husband and I talk about the same issue on what seems like a daily basis– this notion of framing and how it includes or, more often, excludes. Thanks for raising the issue here.
↵ -
Thanks for this. It’s good to see something being done for Palestine: A grassroots movement succeeding where governments often fail.
↵
